What LiDAR delivers in forestry
Traditional plot sampling leaves room for uncertainty—especially on variable terrain. Crews may only sample 5–10% of a compartment, then extrapolate to the rest, which hides patchy establishment or localised failures. Access constraints, uneven ground, and human error compound the problem: counts are often inconsistent between surveyors, and repeat audits can differ by double‑digit percentages. That’s before considering the time and cost of putting staff in the field for days to capture enough samples.
Our integrated drone missions solve these gaps. In a single flight we capture LiDAR, multispectral, thermal, and RGB imagery together, giving you a consistent canopy height model (CHM), plant health indices, stress maps, and high‑resolution context across the whole compartment. That way stocking, survival, and gaps are measured, not estimated—and every tree is tagged with a full set of attributes from one mission.
Our workflows: nursery & in-field
Nursery & saplings
High-density LiDAR with optional multispectral and thermal layers to monitor early growth. We compute plant counts per block, row gaps, and vigour trends so you can intervene early.
In-field restock
Compartment-scale LiDAR to derive CHM, survival, and stocking heatmaps. We flag under-stocked polygons and priority replant zones with coordinates you can act on.
Fusing the four data sets
Our analysis doesn’t rely on one sensor alone. We fuse LiDAR, multispectral, thermal, and RGB photogrammetry into a single aligned grid. That means:
- LiDAR gives us structure and canopy height models.
- Multispectral layers provide NDVI and plant health indices.
- Thermal imagery shows stress and water-deficit patterns.
- RGB offers visual context, ground truthing, and high-res mapping.
All four datasets are co-registered so every tree has a consistent set of attributes: height, vigour, stress, and visual confirmation. This fusion makes survival analysis more robust, especially in variable stands where one sensor alone could misclassify conditions.
How the Forest LiDAR Analyser works
Behind the scenes, our own Forest LiDAR Analyser platform handles the heavy lifting. It ingests the raw flight data, automatically aligns the four sensor outputs into the same grid, and checks them against our QA thresholds. The Analyser then applies rule‑based survival logic — for example, counting a tree as live if CHM ≥ 0.20 m, or if NDVI and thermal signatures indicate vigour, even where height is borderline. This way, each stem is validated by multiple evidence layers, not just one.
The Analyser also packages outputs into a reproducible QGIS project, GeoTIFFs, and reports so your team or auditors can re‑trace the analysis step by step. It’s a transparent, audit‑ready workflow designed for forestry, not a black box.
Traditional vs integrated flight
| Aspect | Traditional plots / single-sensor | Forest LiDAR one-flight package |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | 5–10% sampled, extrapolated to rest | ~100% compartment coverage at operational resolution |
| Data layers | Usually one layer (visual or GPS counts) | LiDAR + multispectral + thermal + RGB co-registered |
| Consistency | Surveyor variability; repeatability issues | Aligned grid; same basis each mission |
| Time on site | Days walking plots | Single flight window; rapid mobilisation |
| Safety | Exposure to rough terrain, weather, operations | Minimal ground exposure; remote capture |
| Audit trail | Notes + partial GPS traces | Flight logs, QA thresholds, reproducible processing |
Cost & safety benefits
- Fewer field days: one integrated mission replaces multi-day plot walks.
- Lower H&S risk: less time on steep banks and unstable ground.
- Lean teams: small crew to fly and manage data capture.
- Operational windows: fly tight weather gaps; deliver faster.
Repeatability & change detection
Because all sensors are captured and aligned in one pass, we can rerun the same workflow month‑on‑month or year‑on‑year. That enables like‑for‑like comparisons of survival, height growth, and vigour, and avoids the sampling drift common to manual methods.
Carbon & sustainability reporting
- Reduced travel & boots‑on‑ground lowers survey emissions.
- Stocking & survival accuracy strengthens planting/offset claims.
- GIS deliverables slot into ESG reporting and grant submissions.
- Grant compliance — supports Forestry Commission, DEFRA, and devolved grant schemes that demand auditable stocking and survival evidence.
- Biodiversity Net Gain & carbon accounting — provides quantified, repeatable data that landowners need for statutory BNG and voluntary carbon credit schemes.
Quality assurance that stands up to audit
Every job is validated against hard thresholds, and anything that fails is re-flown or clearly marked in the report. Baseline QA thresholds we work to:
- Coverage ≥ 95% valid area
- Alignment RMSE < 0.20 m
- LiDAR density ≥ 80 pts/m² (mission-dependent)
- Survival rule counted where CHM ≥ 0.20 m OR NDVI ≥ 0.20 OR thermal ΔT is normal for cohort
We also log flight conditions, payload, calibration, and processing settings for full traceability—so the data chain is solid from take-off to PDF.
Count-first KPIs that matter
Tree & survival counts
Total stems, live stems, survival % by block/compartment, and confidence bounds.
Stocking density
Stems per hectare with heatmaps and under‑stocked polygons sized for replant crews.
Height & vigour
Median/percentile CHM plus optional NDVI and thermal ΔT overlays to flag stress.
Report & GIS deliverables
PDF summary + DOCX detail, GeoTIFF rasters, shapefiles/GeoPackages, and a QGIS project.
Split‑stem & double‑plant detection
Identifies multi‑stem clusters from LiDAR point geometry + RGB context; flags for thinning or quality checks.
Gap analysis & replant polygons
Finds contiguous gaps above your threshold (e.g., ≥ 2 m² or ≥ 3 missing trees) and outputs replant polygons with coordinates.
Rows & spacing compliance
Row detection and nearest‑neighbour spacing stats vs planting spec to evidence contractor performance.
Mortality hotspots & stress
Clusters low‑NDVI/thermal‑anomalous stems and cross‑checks against height to separate late starters from true losses.
Species / cohort mapping
Optional classification by block/cohort; supports mixed planting plans and per‑species KPIs.
Change over time
Year‑on‑year deltas for survival, height growth and stocking; repeatable baselines for audits and claims.
Canopy uniformity
Standard deviation and roughness of CHM to indicate exposure, browsing, or weed burden.
Terrain & exposure overlays
DTM‑derived slope/aspect to explain performance variance and guide operational planning.
“We built the pipeline to answer the only question that matters: how many trees are there, how many are alive, and where are the gaps?”
How to get started
- Share your objective — nursery cohort, restock audit, or survival check.
- We scope & quote — flight plan, QA thresholds, outputs, and timelines.
- Fly & deliver — data capture, QC, and a clean report with maps you can use.
Ready to replace sampling guesswork with full-compartment counts?